RE: Fw: [epf-dev] Ballot for voting on PM process element names and next

["Chris Armstrong" <chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Pascal, thanks for voting! Regarding voting multiple times, I was thinking I'd count the latest ballot submitted, so we should be set.

 

I particularly liked your perspective about a product breakdown structure (PBS) and a work breakdown structure (WBS), how they are different, yet related (but not one-to-one). In this language, were you thinking Work Product #2 could be considered the PBS and Work Product #4 the WBS (or sub-views of each)?

 

Thanks, Chris ~:|

 

P.S. Are you interested and available to work on OpenUP PM content? :-)

---

From: Pascal Negros [mailto:pnegros@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:12 PM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Fw: [epf-dev] Ballot for voting on PM process element names and next PM call

SORRY CHRIS 
I miss-checked the 2 first question which are different 
from the assumption I stated at the beginning of my mail!! 
I just resent it with the appropriate answers ... 
Could you please consider this vote rather than 
the former one??

Pasc@l
	Pascal Negros/France/IBM, 33-0869 pnegros@xxxxxxxxxx, +33 (0) 149 050 869 Enterprise Architectures Engineering, Business Strategy Alignment, Governance of Transformation Blue Pages  Get more

----- Forwarded by Pascal Negros/France/IBM 
on 13/07/2006 19:03 -----

Pascal Negros/France/IBM

13/07/2006 09:51

To	epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc	chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [epf-dev] Ballot for voting on PM process element names and next        PM callLink

Myvote below ... I have an assumption (based on the reading of 
the different thread) : we are talking Development Management rather than 
generally speaking Project Management (Development Mgt could be a part of a more 
global Project or a project by itself but dediciated to development). This 
assumption is confirmed by the current target usage of Eclipse: 
Development.

Pasc@l
	Pascal Negros/France/IBM, 33-0869 pnegros@xxxxxxxxxx, +33 (0) 149 050 869 Enterprise Architectures Engineering, Business Strategy Alignment, Governance of Transformation Blue Pages  Get more

"Chris Armstrong" <chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/07/2006 10:18

Please respond to
chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"'Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List'" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] Ballot for voting on PM process element names and next PM        call

Here is the ballot for voting 
on PM process element names. I attempted to include the various names people 
have suggested for these things as choices. If there are any that I overlooked 
or if there are new ones that people would like to suggest, feel free to write 
them in under "Other". To cast your vote, reply to this email message, copy me 
(chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), and place an '"x" in one of the boxes that 
precede each choice to indicate your vote for each element. The voting closes at 
12:00am Friday 7/14 which will allow us to tally the votes and report the 
results at the next PM conference call (scheduled for 8am PST Friday 7/14) and 
the epf-dev mail list.

============================================================

Role #1: [ X ] Development lead, [ ] Project manager, [ ] Team lead, [ ] Technical lead, [ ] Other: _______________

Work Product #1: [ X ] Development plan, [ ] Project plan, [ ] Release plan, [ ] Other: _______________

Work Product #2: [ ] Development item list, [ ] Product backlog, [ ] Development backlog, [ X] Work item list, [ ] Release backlog, [ ] Cross-project backlog, [ ] System work item list, [ ] Project work item list, [ ] Other: _______________

Work Product #3: [ X] Iteration plan, [ ] Other: _______________ : Iteration plan should be a combination of work plan, risk plan, resource plan, finacial plan, ..... I should also be placed in context of the global project plan (the one which contains the considered Development (sub-)project plus other (sub-) projects within the global endeavour of the engagement).

Work Product #4: [ X] Task list, [ ] Sprint backlog, [ ] Work item list, [ ] Team work item list, [ ] Iteration work item list, [ ] Other: The Task List should be organized in a breakdown structure, based on a product breakdown structure and the resource organization. Notice that there is a dependency between the WBS and the PBS but not a 1 to 1 correspondance; recommended representation of placing this inside of Work Product #3

Work Product #5: [ X] Risk list, [ ] Other: _______________

Work Product #6: [ X] Status assessment, [ ] Other: _______________

Report #1: [ X] Development burndown, [ ] Release burndown, [ ] Project burndown, [ ] Other: _______________

Report #2: [ X] Iteration burndown, [ ] Sprint burndown, [ ] Other: _______________

============================================================

Thanks, Chris ~:|

Chris Armstrong ~:|
President
Armstrong Process Group, Inc.
651.491.5575 c
715.246.0383 f
www.aprocessgroup.com
   "proven practical process"

Come see APG at:
---------------
Agile 2006 International Conference
Minneapolis, MN, July 23-28, 2006 - www.agile2006.com
---------------
14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
Minneapolis, MN, September 11-15, 2006 - www.re06.org _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev