Re: [ee4j-community] Process Question

[Mark Little <mlittle@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

On 13 Oct 2017, at 15:19, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2017-10-13 4:08 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:

I really hope that Java EE 9 gets under way while EE4J is getting organized. At JavaOne 2016 a preliminary roadmap for EE 9 was announced - a year later I didn’t hear anything about those proposals (hopefully I missed to). 

The FAQ (https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j/faq) seems to indicate that Java EE 9 will not go forwards, although there's nothing stopping from those proposed technologies starting under EE4J.

My operating assumption is that technical progress will continue, but the end result will not be called Java EE 9. It will be released under whatever the new brand name is.

Project proposals are always welcome :)

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(m) +1.613.220.3223

_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community

---

Mark Little

mlittle@xxxxxxxxxx

JBoss, by Red Hat

Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, 6700 Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Co. Cork.
Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14 Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, No.304873
Directors:Michael Cunningham (USA), Vicky Wiseman (USA), Michael O'Neill, Keith Phelan, Matt Parson (USA)