Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Selection status

[Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good idea Sven,

I've commented on the talks that I gave low scores to:

http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/collaborative-modeling-applied-avionic-design-give-wings-your-team#comment-524

http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/emf-community-time-moving-eclipse4-thanks-extended-editing-framework-20#comment-525

http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/giant-butterfly-effects-software-factories#comment-526

The comments are private right now. I don't think I know enough about the subject matter to ask the authors these questions. If you agree with the comments, then we could ask the authors.

cheers,

ian

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Sven Efftinge <sven.efftinge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Ian, 

On Nov 28, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Unfortunately I find some of these abstracts to be very "big" (maybe colosal is a better word). That is, problems are framed as the biggest challenge facing the audience and in 35 minutes (with a few clicks and the occasional clack), the problem is solved.

As I mentioned on the call on Monday, these could simply be a language thing. Maybe the speaker didn't intended for the talk to sound so 'over-the-top'. Or maybe they just get excited about their work ;-).

I think I know what you mean. But could you be a bit more concrete, so we can help them to come up with a better and straighter title and abstract.

Sven

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource