My apologies, I should have provided more explanation. As others
have said, this was online feedback thru the web site. We did not
get a lot of feedback but some of the sessions did get some.
As with any stats, you should only use it as one source of data.
:-)
On 11/11/2011 9:53 AM, John Arthorne wrote:
> Gunnar Wagenknecht
<gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> There weren't any buckets. Voting had to
be done
online via the
> submission system. This also required to login which may
have scared
> anonymous voters away.
>
> I also noticed that the voting has to be used carefully.
For example,
> one of the Java talks had 50+ people and was very crowed.
But only
five
> voted and one was a really disappointed guy.
Yes now that I have looked through it more, I'm
not
sure how much we can read into the numbers. For example I know
the CDT
tutorial is always popular, and at EclipseCon 2011 it had 40
votes, but
at ECE there was only one vote. I think I'll only take into
account the
first 25 or so that have roughly 10 or more votes, because
with that many
votes you can start to see the trend. For example the talk
with 10 votes
and an average rating of 1.3 was clearly not a winner, but the
talk with
17 votes and an average of 4.7 was clearly popular.
John
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
|
