Hi Bjorn,
Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
Scott Lewis wrote:
Include project leads from a representative sample of projects
Isn't that what it is already? Each project is a member of a Top-Level
Project. Each Top-Level Project has a representative on the Planning
Council. So the PC has representatives of not just a representative
sample, but in fact representatives of all projects.
Well, I would argue that the Technology projects (and perhaps other
projects...e.g. EMFT) are under-represented...because everything
incubates in Technology, and it's only one top-level project. No
slight on Technology or other PMCs intended.
Rotate
PC membership frequently
That's up the PMCs as to who to send to the Planning Council.
Yep.
Have
open PC meetings (not all, but some). I mean open to committers
and contributors.
Have a public communication forum (e.g. IRC channel) for each group
(e.g. PC)
We have a mailing list and it's archived in public, so I'm guessing
that you have additional requirements when you say "public
communication forum". The mailing list is moderated (spam avoidance),
but if someone wanted to send an email to the PC, then could send an
email to the list.
True, but I would bet that the membership for this list is pretty low
among committers and perhaps even project leads. I'm just suggesting
that lighter weight, perhaps more immediate public forums might be
helpful as well (not in exclusion of this one).
Give
the PC power and support to allocate integration testing resources
The PC already has control over 100% of the Foundation's integration
and testing resources. Of course, those resources allocated by the
Board are zero, so 100% * 0 = 0, but you've already got your wish!
+1 for Doug G's solution...now the hard part is implementation :).
Scott
|