| RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Choosing your talks |
Hi, I removed the modeling tag from those talks: https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1098&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1200&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1216&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1243&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1260&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1264&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1326&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1412&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 Can somebody please delete https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1354&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 It has no authors and seems to be a duplicate of https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1357&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 This one has no author as well: https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1519&search=talktag~%27Modeling%27 Please find an excel sheet with my personal opinion Bernd -----Original Message----- From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oisin Hurley Sent: Montag, 21. Dezember 2009 17:46 To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Choosing your talks Hi all, With our tag-based system of marking submissions, there's some fuzziness as to how you should review. Here's some guidelines. 1. You should have already signed up for a tag on the following Doodle page. Note that the OSGi tag is being reviewed by the OSGi DevCon committee, chaired by Peter. http://www.doodle.com/xin4yx3tshy5usvm 2. Get a list of all the talks that have your tag thereupon by entering a search expression talktag~'mytag' into the submission system search. 3. Other people have signed up for the same tag as you, most likely. Collude with them to split up the work. We need to work as mini-teams and come back with recommendations for a particular tag. Here's the people and the tags: [Dave = D. Carver; David = D. Williams] Build and Continuous Integration: Wayne, Oisin, Chris, **Dave, Ketan Business and Industry **Oisin, Bernd, Chris, Ketan CDT **Doug Committer and Contributor Oisin, Wayne, Bernd, **Chris, Dave, Ketan Communication Docs/Education Oisin, **Wayne, Chris, Dave, Ketan Data Tooling <insert cricket noises/> e4 **Wayne, Chris, Ketan Emerging Technology Oisin, **Wayne, Bernd, Chris Java Wayne, **Bernd, Chris JavaEE **David, Bernd Languages Oisin, David, Bernd, Doug, **Ketan Mobile and Embedded **Doug Modeling **Bernd (busy guy!) OSGi The OSGi DevCon Committee Reporting I'm volunteering **Scott! Runtime Oisin, Wayne, Bernd, **Chris SOA **Oisin Test and Performance **Ketan Tools Oisin, David, Chris, **Ketan UI/RCP Wayne, **Chris Web Services Oisin, **David XML Tools Oisin, David, **Dave Those names I have marked with ** are hereby nominated to be the individual representatives of those tag teams to the PC for communications. Notes: * Scott! I've assigned you to the Reporting tag. Anything else you want to look at? * Wayne, Chris, Ketan - you have 3 **s each above, if that is too many, then we can shift them around I am sure * 4. Once you have your review team, a suggested modus operandi would be to a) check to see if the talk is relevant to the tag, and if not remove the tag, leaving a public comment on the talk b) email the PC list with the talks that you have detagged c) Rank the talks per talk type, in order of preference of acceptance. d) Communicate the preference to the PC list I like the way that Top 5 PC Pick worked out in terms of expressing preferences - that approach might work for some of the tag teams - i.e. do the search, export as csv, upload csv to google spreadsheet, work on that for ranking. Note: make sure you mark late-comers. 5. We will have a call on Wednesday as per usual. It would be a very good plan to get in and do a heap of reviewing before then, to give us a good start. Any questions? --oh _______________________________________________ eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
Attachment:
ec2010-modeling.xlsx
Description: ec2010-modeling.xlsx