PC members,
I add my voice to Scott's thanking you for your help in putting
together what I believe is the pinnacle of EclipseCon programs. With no
disrespect to Tim or Doug or Rich of PCs past, I've threatened to
retire from EclipseCons after this one because I don't see how we can
put together a better collection of talks in the future...
However, all kidding aside, there are still three tasks for you:
(1) BLOG ABOUT THE BEST
It's not unexpected, but it is disappointing when some of the first few
planet posts about EclipseCon are "I'm not going" [1,2]...
I want to make sure that we, collectively, the program committee, tell
the world what a great program we've put together. I think that it is
important that the good news come from all of us and that it come out
in a steady drum beat of great stuff. There are 15 main stage talks and
3 keynotes, for a total of at least 18 great posts: one by each of us
and a few more by Scott. I put up a schedule on our wiki page (https://www.eclipsecon.org/wiki/2009_Program_Committee_Blogging):
please reserve your spot and write on that day.
(2) SPREAD THE WORD
This year we're going to use an RFID badge tracking system to keep
track of attendance and abandonment at each session. It's a pretty cool
piece of kit and the way we're using it is completely anonymous: we're
just keeping track of badges entering and leaving but won't have any
names or other identify attributes associated with the badges. Anyway,
the reason I mention this is that, for the first time, we're going to
have real hard numbers on how many people are interested in each talk
and how many people find the speaker or topic boring enough to leave in
the middle. And (here's the catch) we're going to use those numbers to
tailor the number of slots allocated to each category next year. So...
you, as a PC member, will want to make sure that lots of people
interesting in your category show up to EclipseCon. Spread the word and
ensure your categories' current and future success.
(3) TELL US ABOUT THE SUBMISSION SYSTEM
Every year we try to make the submission system work better for you and
every year it probably is better, but every year it also seems to fall
short. Now, while the topic is still fresh in your mind, would be an
excellent time to write a short email to Scott and Gabe and Anne and I
telling us what you'd like to see in a (better/perfect) system. I,
personally, was happy with some aspects, but I found the searching and
sorting too confusing and slow. Some ideas about how we might build a
better one include: I'd like to see some kind of "overall picture grid"
that shows little squares for all the talks and then tags/buttons on
the side. Clicking or mousing the buttons colors the grid squares
corresponding to the selected button(s). This would be a way to get a
sense of the overall space of submissions and the program. Sort of
"program explorer"... Another idea I had was to use spreadsheets for
everything: the submission system takes submissions and then allows the
PC to download spreadsheets of them. The PC annotates their
spreadsheets and then re-uploads. The system uses the PC members
annotation is special columns (e.g., "comment" and "status" and "tags")
to add comments, status, tags, etc. to the submissions. So then PC
members could use their powerful client spreadsheet program's
searching, sorting, and reporting facilities as well as work offline...
What are your ideas?
(4) (a Douglas Adams "trilogy") ATTEND THE PC PARTY
We'll have a little program committee party on Sunday night before
EclipseCon: be sure to make your travel arrangements to be able to
attend. I'm thinking around 5pm at the Hyatt. RSVPs will be later, but
for now just keep it in mind...
Thanks again...
- Bjorn
--
[end of message]
|