Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I suggest that we keep 661 (20 minutes) and just decline 664.

Wayne

David M Williams wrote:
> > 4) Talks 661 and 664 are about Maven 2 Eclipse.  It appears that there 
> >     
> is a different focus within the talks, but I wonder if we really need two 
> M2E talks. 
>
> I agree these look similar enough they could be "combined". One issue with 
> doing that, though, is that apparently they both were "shortened" from 
> their original submitted time/type ... perhaps we should set to one of the 
> long talks ... but, then only have one. Sound feasible? 
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>
>