Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues

From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:20:05 -0500
Delivered-to: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee>
List-help: <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee>, <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee>, <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> 4) Talks 661 and 664 are about Maven 2 Eclipse.  It appears that there 
is a different focus within the talks, but I wonder if we really need two 
M2E talks. 

I agree these look similar enough they could be "combined". One issue with 
doing that, though, is that apparently they both were "shortened" from 
their original submitted time/type ... perhaps we should set to one of the 
long talks ... but, then only have one. Sound feasible?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
  - From: Wayne Beaton

References:
- [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
  - From: Scott Rosenbaum
- Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
  - From: Scott Rosenbaum

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
Next by Date: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
Next by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs