Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials

From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:55:42 -0500
Delivered-to: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee>
List-help: <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee>, <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee>, <mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Was there a conclusion about 2-hr tutorials? Can we have 2, 2 hr. 
tutorials that are not literally merged into one? 
I have 2 submitted that I thing would be suitable (and better) as 2 hours, 
but they can't be meaningfully merged (different topics, one's beginner, 
one advanced, etc. Am I safe to ask the authors? (via comments, I got that 
conclusion :)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials
  - From: Scott Rosenbaum

References:
- Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials
  - From: Eugene Chan
- Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials
  - From: Scott Rosenbaum

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Win an Aardvark
Next by Date: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] More Info
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials
Next by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] 2-hr tutorials
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs