RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Scheduling done -please t

["Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Paul,

Gold Sponsor Talks have their own room, and it does not show up on the
scheduling tool (yet?). So 154 will be scheduled manually.

321 will be scheduled in place of 154 (Wed 11:10, Grand Ballroom C), but
there is a bug in the tool, and I can't schedule it yet.

Regarding moving 122 so that it's contiguous: Sorry, but I did that on
purpose. In order to honor the short talk format, speakers are expected
to speak for 10 minutes only. A couple of categories did some part 1 /
part 2 stuff, and I have staggered them all to keep the speakers honest.
Alternating speakers using alternating podiums, so Sriram will remain at
his spot and just wait until the other speaker finishes before moving on
to Part 2.

Doug 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Paul Slauenwhite
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 7:55 AM
> To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> Cc: Eclipsecon Program Committee list; eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-
> committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Scheduling
done
> -please take a look ASAP
> 
> Hi Doug,
>       Sorry for the late response.
> 
>       The schedule looks fine for the Test and Performance category
> except:
> 
> -Long talk #321 is still outstanding.
> -Can we swap short talk #122 with either #360 or #498 so Sriram can
> have
> contiguous slots?
> -When are the Gold Sponsor Talks scheduled (e.g. #154)?
> 
> PS
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> Paul Slauenwhite
> IBM Toronto Lab, Canada
> 
> Internet: paules@xxxxxxxxxx
> Telephone: (905) 413-3861
> Tie Line: 313-3861
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>              "Gaff, Doug"
>              <doug.gaff@windri
>              ver.com>
> To
>              Sent by:                  "Eclipsecon Program Committee
> list"
>              eclipse.org-eclip
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-
> com
>              secon-program-com         mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>              mittee-bounces@ec
> cc
>              lipse.org
> 
> Subject
>
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-
> com
>              01/17/2008 11:07          mittee] Scheduling done -
please
>              PM                        take a look ASAP
> 
> 
>              Please respond to
>                 Eclipsecon
>              Program Committee
>                    list
>              <eclipse.org-ecli
>              psecon-program-co
>              mmittee@eclipse.o
>                     rg>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi PC,
> 
> I?ve finished scheduling the accepted talks. Most of this was done
> before
> the holidays, but I had a few more things to wrap up.  The process I
> followed is below in case you?re interested.
> 
> There isn?t a lot of time to make major changes, but I need each
> category
> lead to review the ordering of your talks to make sure I didn?t make
> any
> mistakes in order or speaker overlap (hit the swap button to see
> speakers).
> If you want to reorder anything, I need to hear before this coming
> Monday.
> You can view (but not edit) the schedule here:
> 
> https://www.eclipsecon.org/2008/schedulingtool/
> 
> The username/pw is the same one you use for the submission system.
> 
> Doug
> 
> 
> 
> Tutorials
> 
> Group categories as much as possible, avoid speaker overlap, and use
> recommended ordering from category leads.
> 
> Longs/Shorts
> 
> Optimize for:
>       *         no speaker overlap
>       *         no category talk overlap
>       *         minimal repeat category parallelism (e.g. Eclipse and
> OSGi
>       talks aren?t always in parallel)
>       *         even distribution of categories over the three days
>       *         specific talk ordering as recommended by category
leads
>       *         panels in the theatre
> 
> I generated the breakdown in Excel for longs/shorts to figure out
> grouping.
> Then I went to the online tool and dropped things into place.  I
> reordered
> based on my best guess at room size needs.  I also looked for speaker
> overlap and side-by-side speakers on shorts.  I may have missed
> something
> between long and shorts, although because I didn?t allow category
> overlap
> and I checked Philippe closely, I probably haven?t missed very many.
>  _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-
> program-committee
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-
> program-committee