|
It's good to me now :)
Le 29/06/2017 à 18:22, Simon Bernard a
écrit :
Could we go for a freeze code on branch 2.0.x.
I would like to integrate it in Leshan before and did some tests
before to go for the 2.0.0-M4.
This should be ok for tomorrow.
Le 29/06/2017 à 18:11, Kraus Achim (INST/ECS4) a écrit :
So ready for 2.0.0-M4?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Achim Kraus
(INST/ECS4)
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Stuttgarter Straße 130 | 71332
Waiblingen | GERMANY | www.bosch-si.com
Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB
148411 B
Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach, Michael Hahn
-----Original Message-----
From: cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Simon Bernard
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2017 10:44
To: Californium (Cf) developer discussions <cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cf-dev] Ready to release a 2.0.0-M4 ?
It sounds reasonable to fix the large memory consumption of
MessageIdProvider for the 2.0.0-M4.
About "stale handshakes" which issue do you talk about ?
Simon
Le 29/06/2017 à 10:37, Kraus Achim (INST/ECS4) a écrit :
Hi,
I think this could be a good think to
release a 2.0.0-M4 version soon.
Yes, but I would prefer to have #328 also in.
And I have my doubts about the "stale handshakes" ...
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Achim Kraus
(INST/ECS4)
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Stuttgarter Straße 130 |
71332
Waiblingen | GERMANY | www.bosch-si.com
Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB
148411
B
Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach, Michael Hahn
-----Original Message-----
From: cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Simon Bernard
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2017 17:33
To: Californium (Cf) developer discussions <cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cf-dev] Ready to release a 2.0.0-M4 ?
Hi,
We release a milestone version of californium 4 month
ago. A lot of improvement/bug fixes was done since this date.
I think this could be a good think to release a 2.0.0-M4
version soon.
Personally, I would like to integrate this PR[1] in this
new milestone version or at least having a status on that.
WDYT ? Which issue would you like to see in this version
?
Simon
[1]https://github.com/eclipse/californium/pull/336
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev
|
