Re: [cf-dev] Branching strategy

["Kovatsch Matthias" <kovatsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do you mean having everything from element-connector to Actinium in a single repo?

 

I see the point of reducing the maintenance effort. However, it would also convolute the development tracks. I found it actually quite nice that Scandium has had its own track, with separate DTLS-specific issues, discussions, etc. (also commit logs). Also forking out the Actinium development as we did over the last months was quite convenient (I still have to merge it back into the Eclipse repo).

 

Simon, Kai, how do you feel about this from the Scandium perspective?

 

Ciao

Matthias

 

From: cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julien Vermillard
Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 16:48
To: Californium (Cf) developer discussions <cf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cf-dev] Branching strategy

 

Since all the project are released on the same life-cycle, why not first merging everything in the same git repo?

I would make having 3 branches more sustainable.

Julien