Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [babel-dev] ResourceBundleEditor contribution in CVS
Hello Bjorn,
 
(1) A request as already been sent to the webmaster for removing the CVS code.  It should be taken care of shortly (if not already).
(2) Good reading, thanks.  I will do my best to be a good citizen within the community. 
 
But I have one question about commiter rights vs contributors.
 
In these graphs...
 
 
...it says that "commiters" can write code to CVS and "contributors" must attach their code in bugzilla for a commiter to review.
 
Since I am a commiter on the Babel project, why must I comply with what appears to be reserved for "contributors"?   Is it that there is a different flow for commiter's initial contributions not illustrated there?
 
The rest of my reading also suggest that as a commiter, I was OK to put my code in (except I was missing an about.html file).  This document further illustrate my understanding:
 
 
I am by no mean trying to be difficult by asking for clarifications.  I just want to make sure I understand fully what is involved in being a commiter (vs a contributor).  Your help is appreciated.
 
Thank you,
 
Pascal E.
 

From: babel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:babel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: November 6, 2007 12:50 PM
To: Babel committers mailing list
Subject: Re: [babel-dev] ResourceBundleEditor contribution in CVS

Pascal,
Please (1) remove the code from CVS until it is approved and (2) familiarize yourself with the rules of being a committer: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/index-quick.php

- Bjorn

Pascal Essiembre wrote:
Oups, no I was not aware.  By contributed I meant that I have put my code in CVS.
 
Sorry for not being fully aware of all processes involved into being an Eclipse commiter.  This is a new experience to me.   I have just filled in the IP Policy (Contribution Questionnaire).   Please let me know if I am missing anything else.
 
Thank you,
 
Pascal E.


From: babel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:babel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich
Sent: November 5, 2007 7:53 PM
To: 'Babel committers mailing list'
Subject: RE: [babel-dev] ResourceBundleEditor contribution in CVS

Pascal,

Can you explain a little more about what you mean by you “…have contributed … code…”?

I assume that you’re aware that new code needs to go through the IP review process? Since Babel is incubating, it gets to use the parallel IP process.

Mike Milinkovich

Office: +1.613.224.9461 x228

Mobile: +1.613.220.3223

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

From: babel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:babel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pascal Essiembre
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 1:24 PM
To: 'Babel committers mailing list'
Subject: [babel-dev] ResourceBundleEditor contribution in CVS

Hello All,

I have contributed my code in progress for the RessourceBundle Editor. 

Rather than being a straight port of the SourceForge project coming from...

... the code actually comes from a rewrite of it that was already in progress (it was agreed

in an early conference call I would commit the rewrite work and not the stable one found

on SF).  

As such it is not nearly as stable or complete yet as the one on SourceForge.
 One can refer to the original SourceForge "ResourceBundle Editor" plugin to get
 a better feel for it until this one gets fixed/completed.

It is heavily being worked on and far from being "clean" code yet.  It was
put in CVS at this early stage so people can see it in action and monitor progress.

Once as mature as its SourceForge equivalent, I will make sure to let everyone know.

Thanks,

  -- Pascal Essiembre (pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)


_______________________________________________
babel-dev mailing list
babel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-dev

--

[end of message]

Back to the top