+1
From: Tim deBoer
[mailto:deboer@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:15 AM
To: WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions)
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] Please review evolution proposal
+1
Tim deBoer
(905) 413-3503
deboer@xxxxxxxxxx
David M Williams ---01/20/2010 09:07:00 AM---PMC Members,
Given our discussion and the controversy around bug 298906,
|
From:
|
David M Williams
<david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To:
|
"wtp-pmc"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
Date:
|
01/20/2010 09:07 AM
|
|
Subject:
|
[wtp-pmc] Please review evolution proposal
|
|
Sent by:
|
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
PMC Members,
Given our discussion and the controversy around bug 298906,
I'd like to ask your explicit review of the proposed solution.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=298906#c46
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=298906#c47
The latest proposal would allow N-1 projects to function as they were,
even if touched by version N. But brand new projects created with version N
would not work with version N-1.
I think this is acceptable and a typical way that other Eclipse projects
evolve changes, but wanted to be sure you all agreed. So, please
respond with your explicit vote indicating agreement, or not.
Thank you,
_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
