>>A successful advisory vote requires at least
three +1s from the Membership external to the Project's Leadership Chain
Can we solicit votes from WTP committers? If so, I
will post this to wtp-dev. We got 1 vote and just 2 more to go!
-Raghu
From: Neil Hauge
[mailto:neil.hauge@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007
8:19 PM
To: raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx;
WTP PMC communications (including
coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] Community
votes for JSF/Dali..
It's not completely obvious, but here are the exact
lines from the Dev Process:
- At the end of the Review period, the EMO(ED)
holds a public advisory vote of all Eclipse Members (which for clarity
includes Committers Members as defined in the
Bylaws 3.3(d)). Votes may be cast early via the appropriate mailing
list, but are not counted until the end of the Review period.
- A successful
advisory vote requires at least three +1s from the Membership external to
the Project's Leadership Chain.
- A successful
advisory vote requires at least one +1 from each level of the Project's
Leadership Chain.
- A successful
advisory vote requires no upheld -1s. An Upheld
-1 is a -1 that is followed within 24 hours by open,
transparent, and public justification, and that justification is accepted
by the EMO. Rejected -1s count as 0s.
- A successful
advisory vote requires, if applicable, +1s from each of the Project's
Mentors.
So one thing that we do need is a vote from someone on the PMC. Any
volunteers? :) Since we didn't get any votes right away, I am now
soliciting votes from the Dali community. I think it is just a matter of
people knowing that they need to vote, and then knowing whether or not they are
eligible.
Neil
raghunathan srinivasan wrote:
Hi,
All week long I have seen votes for PTP, but none for
JSF and Dali. Who can vote? Do we need to actively ask folks to vote?
-Raghu
_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc