It's not completely obvious, but here are the exact lines from the Dev
Process:
- At the end of the Review period, the EMO(ED) holds a public
advisory vote of all Eclipse Members (which for clarity includes
Committers Members as defined in the Bylaws 3.3(d)). Votes may be cast early via the
appropriate mailing list, but are not counted until the end of the
Review period.
- A successful advisory vote requires at least three +1s from
the Membership external to the Project's Leadership Chain.
- A successful advisory vote requires at least one +1 from each
level of the Project's Leadership Chain.
- A successful advisory vote requires no upheld -1s. An Upheld
-1 is a -1 that is followed within 24 hours by open, transparent,
and public justification, and that justification is accepted by the
EMO. Rejected -1s count as 0s.
- A successful advisory vote requires, if applicable, +1s from
each of the Project's Mentors.
So one thing that we do need is a vote from someone on the PMC. Any
volunteers? :) Since we didn't get any votes right away, I am now
soliciting votes from the Dali community. I think it is just a matter
of people knowing that they need to vote, and then knowing whether or
not they are eligible.
Neil
raghunathan srinivasan wrote:
Hi,
All week long I have seen
votes for PTP, but none for JSF
and Dali. Who can vote? Do we need to actively ask folks to vote?
-Raghu
_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
|