RE: [wtp-pmc] Open server adapter contributions
We're essentially at feature cut-off for 1.5, so at this point I think
installable server runtimes are the only option for this release to
W.r.t. the other question...we have to walk a careful line here. While
we should accept legitimate code contributions from all sources, I
suggest that we also adopt the following policies:
* Only the organization who owns a logo/trademark can associate it
with a server runtime. This is necessary to protect the rights of the
* Server runtimes contributed from 3rd parties are identified by the
name of the contributor. E.g.: "Caucho server runtime (contributed by
Gunnar Wagenknecht)". That makes the source clear, and users will be
informed of the source of the runtime.
From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gorkem Ercan
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:12 PM
Subject: [wtp-pmc] Open server adapter contributions
I would like to get the PMC opinion on two server adapter contributions
that are submitted via bugzilla.
The first contribution[ 1] is for Caucho Resin by Gunnar Wagenknecht
The second contribution is for Pramati Server by Navalkumar
I would like to get the PMC opinion whether if we may continue to
distribute more server adapters in WTP or we should direct contributors
and accept these contributions as an installable server adapter.
Also what is our criteria for accepting those contributions ( other than
the technical ones, of course ).For example, To ensure a continuation of
support should we accept contributions from individuals or only from
that actually develop the servers?
wtp-pmc mailing list