Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP Architecture Block Diagram

Looks great; two minor typos:


  • “STF” à “STP”
  • “PHP Development” à “PHP Development”


From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:24 PM
To: WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Subject: RE: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP Architecture Block Diagram


Tim, thanks for much for your comments. They were very helpful, and right on the point, so ... within the limits of my charting ability ... I implemented all of them.
Well, except I did leave in the "functional" part of the chart (e.g. SOA, AJAX) but then also included the name of the project (STF, AJT).

"Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/24/2006 10:19 PM

Please respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,  and Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>


"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,  and Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>




RE: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP Architecture Block Diagram




A few suggestions:

  • I would consider just dropping the special color for JSF, under the assumption that we’re drawing the architecture as it will exist circa 1.5/Callisto. You could indicate that it will be in a “less than 1.0 release” status somehow if you think that’s helpful.
  • I would treat Dali the same way as JSF, since circa 1.5 it will be in a similar state (WTP component in tech preview).
  • I would move AJAX into the dark grey (WTP) box, but give it a different color or outline to indicate “future” status. (Lighter blue color? Dashed outlines?)
  • For consistency, rename: SOA à STP, AJAX à ATF.
  • Suggest merging the downstream projects (STP, PHP, BIRT, TPTP) into a single dark blue box – I don’t see a need to distinguish between “current” and “future” w.r.t. our relationship to them, so I would label them something neutral and symmetric with “Prerequisite Projects” below…maybe just “Downstream projects”. (The current labels somehow suggest that we’re not really doing a good job of integrating with them)
  • DTP should go in the “Prerequisite Projects” box, using whatever “future indicator” (lighter color and/or dashed outline) you choose for Dali.

Thanks for working on this!


Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

Back to the top