I’m in favor of another maintenance
pack as well; my only concern here is that May is very close to our June
release. Would the end of April be acceptable for IBM’s needs?
From:
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006
6:14 AM
To: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wtp-pmc] IBM
Requirements for WTP 1.0.2
On behalf of IBM I am formally requesting a second
maintenance release, around May. Our experience with WTP 1.0.1 builds so far
indicates that although the quality is improving, we anticipate a continued
stream of defects that will acculumate to a significant quantity two or three
months after 1.0.1 is released. We'd therefore like a maintenance refresh to
roll up these fixes. Virtually all of these fixes would apply to WTP 1.5, so
aside from the overhead of maintaining a separate CVS branch and additional
builds, this should not be an undue burden on the development team.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
