[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[wtp-pmc] RE: WTP Article for July JDJ
|
Mike,
I agree. But if you look at the two
diagrams, you'll see they are a little different. The charter diagram just
shows 4 quadrants, but the article shows the explicit scope of JST and
WST within the quadrants.
The scope JST is the J2EE subset of
the JCP quadrant.
JDO is in the JCP quadrant but outside
the J2EE subset, so is not in scope for JST. The PMC agrees that
JDO is more aligned with the Data Tools project.
The PMC is going to propose some clearer
wording and a better, updated diagram. JSF will not be in the J2EE subset.
Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
"Mike Milinkovich"
<mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
07/12/2005 02:53 PM
Please respond to
mike.milinkovich |
|
To
| Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
cc
| <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'" <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Subject
| RE: WTP Article for July
JDJ |
|
Arthur,
My recollection is somewhat different.
First, as I recall, the test of
whether a technology is in JST's scope is not whether it is a JSR. It is
whether it is a defined piece of J2EE. That's what the top-right
quadrant meant in my memory. The whole right side meant Java, with J2EE
at the top, non-J2EE JCP technologies hovering around the middle and less
standard technologies as you moved further down the axis.
Second, I recall discussing JDO
explicitly on the creation review call, and it was used as an example of
a "near-J2EE" technology that is out of scope initially.
Now this has changed with the various
JCP machinations around JSR220 and JSR243, but I don't think that the charter
document is actually wrong.
Does this make sense?
From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: July 11, 2005 10:46 AM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: WTP Article for July JDJ
Mike,
Good catch. I think the charter is actually wrong since that horizontal
line was supposed to separate the JCP from the defacto standards, and JDO
is clearly a JSR (actually two - JSR-12 and JSR-243).
Would you like us to update the charter to correct that error and include
J2EE 5.0? What's the EMO process for that?
In any case, the diagram in the article is accurate because it shows JDO
in the JCP quadrant but outside the scope of JST.
Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
"Mike Milinkovich"
<mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
07/11/2005 09:58 AM
Please respond
to
mike.milinkovich |
|
To
| Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: WTP Article for July
JDJ |
|
Arthur,
One thing that jumped out at me
is that the project charter (http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/project-charter.html)
shows JDO "below the line", while the diagram on the last page
of the article shows it "above the line". This is a potential
source of confusion.
Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director,
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Office: 613-224-9461 x228
Cell: 613-220-3223
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
blog: http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/
From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: July 9, 2005 6:43 PM
To: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: WTP Article for July JDJ
Just a heads up, the attached article is scheduled to appear in the July
issue of JDJ. The copy will be corrected to have the new WTP version numbers.
Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
>
> Old New
> WTP 1.0 WTP 0.7
> WTP 1.1 WTP 1.0
> WTP 2.0 WTP 1.5
> J2EE 1.5 J2EE 5.0