Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-dev] JavaScript Editor with NJSDoc


The end of the week is definitely fine. Thanks for your understanding. 

Mike Milinkovich

From: John Peberdy
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:38 PM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: license@xxxxxxxxxxx; Ian Skerrett
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] _javascript_ Editor with NJSDoc

(Resending using the correct email address)

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24/04/2013 7:56 AM, John Peberdy wrote:

Earlier this month I made this fork of JSDT available. While working on this my goal was to have it eventually merged back in. This is the reason it is currently using the same plugin names. I would be very happy if it did get merged in. I would like to gauge your interested in merging it.


I hate to be the heavy, but I am duty-bound to point out that the Eclipse Foundation considers its namespace as a trademark[1]. Fundamentally, we want the org.eclipse package names to denote code that actually comes from Eclipse projects. Your continued use of the org.eclipse package names is in violation of our trademark policy.

It would be wonderful if your fork can be merged back into the JSDT mainline code development. However, if that is not possible, we would kindly ask that you modify your package names as soon as possible.

Thanks for the feedback, trademark violation was not intentional. I will change the name before the end of the week. If that is not soon enough, let me know! I had not made the change sooner because I was hoping that Eclipse would desire progress in JSDT.


Best regards,

Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director,
Eclipse Foundation
wtp-dev mailing list

John Peberdy

Back to the top