|Re: [wtp-dev] Facet's not asking runtime/server about libraries -intentional or error ?|
I'm curious as to the purpose of this functionality. What is the intent?
that the runtime can provide only the relevant libraries. Currently we have to include all *.jar's found in JBoss AS lib folder because we are never told JPA or JSF is enabled on the project.
As to the why, and not understanding fully the purpose of this request, JPA libraries are in many ways only loosely connected with the runtime/server libraries. JPA can be implemented on runtimes that do not support JPA implicitly, and a separate JPA implementation may be substituted even for runtimes that do support it. We leave it to the user at the moment to tell us whether she intends to use the runtime libraries or she intends to supply her own.
Sure - but you then end up with duplicate jars; the ones provided by the runtime by default because it cannot know if it should provide it or not and the users jar.
We did not add JPA support intrinsically to the runtime definitions mainly because that would limit the runtimes usable for projects with the JPA facet. Or is this tangential to the discussion?
This is just about the facet install delegate checking if there is a runtime associated and ask it for jars (if the user stated he wanted the server to provide it)
A runtime that doesn't have JPA should/would just ignore the request (that's at least my understanding on how this is supposed to work ;)
Note: in the current situation I as a user would simply have to just delete the runtimes provide classpath container since it is doomed to be wrong in all cases with respect to JSF/JPA ...(wrong in the sense there can/will be duplicated jar's)
Paul Fullbright Oracle Corp. Eclipse Dali/Java Persistence Tools Development paul.fullbright@xxxxxxxxxx Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:fyi: JSF: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=198999 JPA: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=199000 /maxMy guess as to the "why" question is that this hasn't been requested by anyone before. Right now only jst.java and module facets use the classpath provider facility, but the facility was designed so that any facet could use it if it makes sense for that facet. I do not know thedesign and implementation details of how JSF and JPA facets manage their libraries, but I would suggest opening enhancement requests (one for JSF and one for JPA) to continue this conversation and to figure out if thischange makes sense for these facets.Will do that - but just wondering what the intended behavior is; I would expect that facet's should be encouraged to do similar things when it comes to libraries....and the "Server provides libraries" option for these two would indicate they at least should let the runtime know about the changes.In any case: Is there a way for a runtime to know which facet's are being added to a project that it is connected to ?e.g. if I move a project from runtime/server A to runtime/server B the classpath should be updated - but that does not seem to happen. Should it not ?/max- Konstantin -----Original Message----- From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Stryker Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 2:57 PM To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. Cc: jbosstools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [wtp-dev] Facet's not asking runtime/server about libraries-intentional or error ? The type of "alert" not being given by the JSF and JPA facets are usually called by a line similar to the one below: ClasspathHelper.addClasspathEntries(project, fv)); The line above alerts the runtime of the facet version's new inclusion and is borrowed from the WebFacetInstallDelegate. I echo Max's query. Why don't the other facets such as JSF / JPA do the same? Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:Hi,I noticed today that when enabling JSF or JPA on projects neither of them consults the server/runtime about which jars that are relevant for it.dynamic web and the java facet does....why not jpa and jsf ?some runtimes could return an optimized set of jars if this were done instead of just returning *everything* ....I'm i missing something obvious ? what about JPA projects that won't be dynamic web apps ? /max _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-devNotice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it._______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
Back to the top