It appears a dedicated group of bug
watchers would like to get rid of "resolved - LATER" when we
move to bugzilla 3.0.
I'm not sure if that will happen or
not, but suggest we get rid of this deprecated field.
Accordingly, I added a "Future"
milestone target to each WTP project.
I also did a "mass update"
to the 42 bugs marked "resolved - later",
changing them to "reopened"
with a "future" milestone target.
Those should be (re) examined as we
ponder our requirements for 3.0, but figured
the "future" designation was
the best state to move it to, before bugzilla 3.0 upgrade.
I've update our WTP bugzilla workflow
document to describe the convention of using "future" --
it should NOT be used for "mass
updates" to all untargeted bugs ... feel free to add to this workflow
One thing I could not easily handle
is the bugs that were marked "closed - later".
Will the assignee's of these bugs listed
below please go through them and
if the bug was really fixed and closed,
please remove the "later" resolution by re-opening and resolving
If these were mistakenly put in "closed"
state, then simply re-open them, and move to an appropriate milestone target.
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx CLOS LATE WTP - internal API 115301 jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE Module.getAdapter() adaptes incorrectly 122761 jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE Incorrect EJB IVirtualComponent returned 146336 jsf.core-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE Source types do not resolve in super-classes 147389 jsf.core-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE Validation markers are not removed after as-you-type vali...
CLOS LATE [faces-config editor] All code is identified as API
jsf.core-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx CLOS LATE Plug-in org.eclipse.jst.jsf.facesconfig
kchong@xxxxxxxxxx CLOS LATE Make XSD Editor more extensible 128996 kosta@xxxxxxx
CLOS LATE FacetSelectionPanel error dialog never goes away 58368 richkulp@xxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE Init parser cannot handle bitwise OR in font style 94889 wst-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE [arch] Request for API Review for M5: common.frameworks 94891 wst-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE [arch] Request for API Review for M5: WST Server Component
wst.rdb-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx CLOS LATE RDB Perspective 129189 yung-chang.chen@xxxxxxxxxx
CLOS LATE Performance is not good when extarcting JAR from jsfLibra...
jst.j2ee-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx CLOS LATE TVT 3.1: TCT 299 - Truncated