Re: [wtp-dev] Convention for "internal" packages

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

You may want to announce your API changes
more widely to members of the Europa release train.  Projects could
reasonably assume that since the Europa API freeze (M6) has passed that
the WTP APIs will be stable. Here's a link to the Europa schedule:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Europa_Simultaneous_Release#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates

John

"Ian Trimble" <ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/04/2007 12:51 PM

Please respond to
"ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx" <ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."        <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[wtp-dev] Convention for "internal" packages

We're cleaning up our package names and declaring
API in the JSF Tools Project. We will be refactoring to remove "internal.provisional"
from our package names. Also, we have inherited some code that currently
does not include "internal" in the package name but we do not
consider it API. Is it enough to manipulate the bundle manifest to mark
as "x-internal" for these non-API packages, or should we also
be injecting "internal" into non-API package names? What is the
convention?
 
Thanks,
 - Ian (JSF Tools Project)
 
------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Trimble
JDeveloper Group
Oracle Corporation Canada Inc.
Office: (250) 954-0837
Email: ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.oracle.com
------------------------------------------------------------
This email may contain confidential and privileged
material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
please contact the sender and delete all copies.
 _______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev