Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

Web Service tools including the Web Service explorer, SOAP, UDDI, and WSIL models, and views. WSDL specific issues are handled by the WSDL component. Java Web service issues are handled by the JST Web service component.

wst.ws-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx

wst.wsdl

WSDL tools including the editor, model, views, wizards, validator, etc.

wst.wsdl-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx

wst.wsi

Web Service Interoperability (WS-I) Test Tools including the WS-I WSDL validator and SOAP validator.

wst.wsi-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx

wst.xml

XML tools including the editor, model, views, wizards, validator, etc.

wst.xml-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx

wst.xsd

XML Schema tools including the editor, views, wizards, validator, etc.

wst.xsd-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx

Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 02:17 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

Lawrence,

Yes, I can change the descriptions, default assignee and default QA contact. Just for fun I updated the documentation description and made you the QA contact.

If anyone has a better description for their component, send it to me.

Components

Name	Description	Default owner	QA contact
documentation	Web Tools online documentation including Help, Dynamic Help, and Infopops.	webtools.documentation-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx	lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx
FAQ	Frequently Asked Questions	webtools.faq-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
J2EE Standard Tools	J2EE Standard Tools	jst-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
jst.ejb	Ejb editors, models, views, wizards, etc.	jst.ejb-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
jst.j2ee	J2EE models, natures and builders for J2EE projects, and j2ee modules views, wizards, etc.	jst.j2ee-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
jst.jsp	JSP editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	jst.jsp-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
jst.server	J2EE Server Tools framework and adapters for selected popular J2EE servers such as Apache Tomcat.	jst.server-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
jst.servlet	Servlet editors, models, views, wizards, etc.	jst.servlet-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
jst.ws	Java Web service wizard and adapters for selected popular J2EE Web service engines such as Apache Axis.	jst.ws-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
releng	releng	webtools.releng-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web Standard Tools	Web Standard Tools	wst-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
website	website	webtools.website-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.command	wst.command	wst.command-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.common	Common utilities and infrastructure	wst.common-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.css	CSS editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	wst.css-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.dtd	DTD editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	wst.dtd-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.html	HTML/XHTML editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	wst.html-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.internet	Internet preferences, Web browser support, and the TCP/IP monitor	wst.internet-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst._javascript_	_javascript_ editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	wst._javascript_-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.rdb	Relational database model, database server explorer, connections, tables and views.	wst.rdb-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.server	Server Tools framework and adapters for selected servers.	wst.server-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.sse	Structured Source Editor framework.	wst.sse-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.validation	Validation framework which coordinates the registration and execution of validators.	wst.validation-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.web	Models, natures and builders for Web projects.	wst.web-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.ws	Web Service explorer, SOAP, UDDI, and WSIL models, and views.	wst.ws-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.wsdl	WSDL editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	wst.wsdl-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.wsi	WS-I Test Tools which will be repatriated from the WSVT project.	wst.wsi-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.xml	XML editor, model, views, wizards, etc.	wst.xml-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx
wst.xsd	XSD editor, views, wizards, etc.	wst.xsd-inbox@xxxxxxxxxxx

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 01:52 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

Thanks for the pointer Amy. I'd forgotten all about that page. The descriptions do need to be updated (there's still a reference to WSVT!) but I don't have access.

Arthur and David - Do either of you have access (in the committer tools) to change component descriptions for WTP bugzilla?

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx

Amy Wu <amywu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 01:31 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

> Then some good writer, like you, creates an easy-to-understand document that describes how to guess which component is behind the bug. Maybe even include a little decision diagram.

More descriptive than this? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/describecomponents.cgi?product=Web%20Tools
Granted, I don't know how obvious it is for bug reporters to click on the "Component" link when you are viewing/opening a bug, but maybe that document should just be beefed up more?

______________________________
Amy Wu
Structured Source Editor
919.254.0299, T/L 444.0299
amywu@xxxxxxxxxx

Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 11:54 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

Lawrence,

Here's what I was thinking. When a user assigns a bug to the wrong component, we move it to the right component and paste in a boilerplate comment like:

"Thank you for reporting this bug. It has been moved to the correct component. For guidance on how to guess which component is associated with a bug,
please refer to http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/HowToGuessComponents.html"

Then some good writer, like you, creates an easy-to-understand document that describes how to guess which component is behind the bug. Maybe even include a little decision diagram.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 11:20 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

>4. Triaging is just part of the problem. There are plenty of triaged bugs that have been opened for a long time. How should we maintain the hygiene of bugzilla?

Great point Arthur. WTP is currently sitting with 1984 unconfirmed, new, assigned and reopened bugs. The 80 from WST and JST don't seem like our biggest issue at this point.

>5. Is there anything we can do to help users assign bugs to the right component? Maybe add a boilerplate comment explaining how to do it. Maybe add >something to the Web site that explains the components? A decision tree?

I don't think there's much we can do in the bugzilla interface aside from opening a bug against bugzilla. I don't think listing the components with descriptions on another page will serve much use. (Are users really going to go to another page to read the description?) If these components continue to be a problem and Arthur and Naci do not have the time I'll volunteer to monitor and triage bugs opened against WST and JST.

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx

Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 10:36 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

John,

I don't recall this issue being discussed before (but I have a very selective memory). Maybe the problem was that no one was assigned to those subproject level components, after which Naci and I got assigned? In any case, before we go deleting components, I'd like us to come up with answers to the following:

1. How to we handle bugs that really do have subproject scope?
2. If a component is deleted, what happens to the bugs that were previously assigned to it?
3. How should we ensure that all inboxes are being triaged? Is that something to add to the weekly telecons?
4. Triaging is just part of the problem. There are plenty of triaged bugs that have been opened for a long time. How should we maintain the hygiene of bugzilla?
5. Is there anything we can do to help users assign bugs to the right component? Maybe add a boilerplate comment explaining how to do it. Maybe add something to the Web site that explains the components? A decision tree?

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

John Lanuti <jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 10:19 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

Arthur,

This is not the first time this has happened or the first time we have suggested removal of these ambiguous queues. Make no mistake, it is a HUGE deal when ~80 bugs go unnoticed until when we are in release candidate mode. We were specifically told not to monitor this Web Standard Tools queue because we were assured the defects would be triaged accordingly. So, here we are...again.

Proposal: We use wst.web instead, and drop Web Standard Tools so this can be proactively avoided.

Reality: This will never be an issue again because now I know it is incumbent upon me to include this queue in my queries and I and other diligent committers will keep it up to date.

John Lanuti
Software Engineer, IBM Rational
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
t/l 441-7861

"I know this lady way down in my country.
She is so pretty that my eyes throw disguises at me.
Now we will sit and we'll wonder about our future,
But now I'm thinking that today sounds fine to me." - Of A Revolution

Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/05/2006 09:33 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

Chuck,

The subproject leads own those components. I own the WST one. I thought I was keeping up, but was shocked to see so many untriaged. I don't know how they slipped by.

Many users don't know which component to assign a defect to so they just use the subproject. Also, there are some cases where a bug affects an entire subproject, or even the entire project.

I suggest we keep these, but watch eachother's backs. We should routinely do a query on the inboxes and route them to the right components.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

Chuck Bridgham <cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/04/2006 05:05 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

No that should be removed too.... I would rather have the originator guess wrong, and see it moved to the right component, then have it sit there unseen.

- Chuck

Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)

Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/04/2006 04:58 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

If we choose to remove this component is there any value to keeping the "J2EE Standard Tools" component?

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx

Chuck Bridgham <cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/04/2006 04:41 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....

It was brought to our attention this week that we have many untriaged defects sitting in various "inbox's"
A Majority of these were in the "Web Standard Tools" component where there is no clear owner, and it was brought up in the past this component should be removed from bugzilla.

Unless we have active triaging on this component, I vote to remove this component ASAP, to avoid this situation in the future. Many of these defects should have been openned in components that I own, and
we had no idea they existed.

I want to thank John Lanuti for triaging many many defects in this component today, but we strongly vote to terminate this abandoned component.

Thanks - Chuck

Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....
  - From: Arthur Ryman

References:
- Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....
  - From: Arthur Ryman

Prev by Date: RE: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....
Next by Date: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approval for 140035, 140431and 140433 for WTP 1.0.3
Previous by thread: Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....
Next by thread: Re: [wtp-dev] Untriaged defects....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs