Re: [wtp-dev] Our march to M4
I guess we both made independent schedule plans. Which one should
At 07:55 PM 4/15/2005, you wrote:
Given our status,
plans and goals for M4, there's the general plan for builds/testing for
the next little while.
The main goal is to have a Milestone quality build by
Tuesday morning so we, and community, can
have several days to test for any show-stopping defects.
We'll change cruise control to do "continuous"
I-builds for the next several days, following the usual
schedule of 11 PM, 8:30 AM, and 3:30 PM (EDT). And,
please remember, there's roughly a 15 minute
lag between extssh commits and pserver fetches .. so
commit/release early !
Teams with large renames/refactorings still to do should
work directly with effect teams, and plan a time
that teams can respond before next scheduled I-build and all
have a coordinated "release" of changes,
or I-build will fail miserably and do no one any good.
Teams should "continuously" be picking up
I-builds, sniff testing, and making sure blocking/critical fixes.
From talking to EMF and JEM team leads, the version of EMF
we should use for this milestone
we'll try and get that in today's 3:30 build.
and JEM I20050415xxxx, to be created later today,
we'll get that in Saturday's builds.
(no substantial changes are expected, but we should use a
coordinated "stable" version
to be reproducible and to report bugs against ... both these
teams say they are not really
producing "M" builds of these packages, but these
are based on M6, and JEM will be based on 0414 EMF.
I believe the GEF pre-req has already been fixed, and will
be in today's 3:30 build.
Naci or Ozgur .. can you check if we can capture and upload
"console log" from JUnit tests ....
that might be helpful is detecting problems.
wtp-dev mailing list
Inonu cad. Sumer sok. Zitas D1-15
Kozyatagi, Istanbul 81090
+90 (532) 573 7783 (cell)
+90 (216) 361 5434 (phone)
+90 (216) 361 2034 (fax)