Re: [wtp-dev] Virtual API progress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [wtp-dev] Virtual API progress

From: John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:28:17 -0500
Delivered-to: wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/wtp-dev>
List-help: <mailto:wtp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev>, <mailto:wtp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev>, <mailto:wtp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

David wrote on 29/03/2005 01:23:10 PM: > Isn't changing the Hierarchy an API compatibility problem (that is, > binary compatibility) ? Or is that just with Classes, not Interfaces?
No, adding extra super-interfaces is fine, as long as the interface is labelled not to be implemented by clients. Purely additive changes won't break existing clients.

References:
- Re: [wtp-dev] Virtual API progress
  - From: David M Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [wtp-dev] Virtual API progress
Next by Date: Re: [wtp-dev] EJB Components
Previous by thread: Re: [wtp-dev] Virtual API progress
Next by thread: Re: [wtp-dev] Virtual API progress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs