Re: [wtp-dev] WTP Component Name Usage Guildelines - common component

[Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ella,

IMHO, I don't see this as a special
case, We have a component named "common" so that should appear
in the names so that it's easy to tell where the code is from.

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/

Ella Belisario/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: wtp-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/05/2004 02:26 PM

Please respond to
wtp-dev

To	wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[wtp-dev] WTP Component Name Usage Guildelines - common component

Hi,

we have the following plugins under 'common' component currently in CVS:

-wst
      - common
            - org.eclipse.wst.contentmodel
            - org.eclipse.wst.encoding
            - org.eclipse.wst.ui
            - org.eclipse.wst.ui.properties
            - org.eclipse.wst.uriresolver
            - org.eclipse.wst.validation.core

According to package naming conventions, 'common' should follow 'wst',
however there is another opinion that in this special case of common code,
component name is not necessary.
I'd like to confirm that we don't want to relax the rule in this special
case.

Best regards,

Ella Belisario
IBM Toronto Software Laboratory
8200 Warden Avenue
Markham, Ontario L6G 1C7
Tel:   905-413-5834     Fax:   905-413-4903

_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev