Ed, thanks for the offer to merge, but,
to avoid duplicated work, thought I would mention we will be doing a little
work to assess what, exactly, the modifications were, and what, if any
is the best way to merge back in to soon-to-be active stream (as we make
it public, that is, sorry for the offset delay).
The zipped up contribution appears to
contain everything (from servers to webservices) but from what I've read
on newsgroup, editing was the function most talked about, so I'd expect
fixes/improvements to be in that area. So, someone from our editing team
will do some diffs on whole thing and make an initial inspection to determine
nature and extent of changes. We'll decide second step from there.
I'm sure in future Genuitec would be
happy to contribute fixes in the form of patches against CVS version, once
that version is in CVS! (and we've be happy to have them :)
And, I should add, if you've already
done any assessment yourself or have an idea of what was fixed, exactly,
don't hesitate to make your own recommendations to this list.
<Ed.Burnette@xxxxxxx> Sent by: wtp-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/11/2004 03:40 PM
Please respond to
RE: [wtp-dev] Source updates?
Ok. When you say "the code
will be checked into CVS" do you mean checked in at eclipse.org under
the webtools repository or do you mean something else?
Also, is there a plan for merging
in the Genuitec fixes or is that still to be decided?
I could help with merges but I
don't want to duplicate somebody else's work.
From: wtp-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 1:35 PM
IBM is completing a product release
and will refresh its contribution in a few weeks. The refresh will include
bugs fixes, completed function, etc. At that time, the code will be checked
into CVS and we will work on it there. We have held off working in CVS
since we cannot afford to maintain dual code streams.