Re: [ufk-dev] maven build and stuff

[Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kenneth,

I've just updated our target setup to Galileo GA and fixed the SWT-Setup
via .psf.

Tom

Kenneth Westelinck schrieb:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Tom Schindl
> <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Kenneth Westelinck schrieb:
>     >
>     >
>     > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Kenneth Westelinck
>     > <kenneth.westelinck@xxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:kenneth.westelinck@xxxxxxxxx>
>     <mailto:kenneth.westelinck@xxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:kenneth.westelinck@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >         > Will you upload the bundles in our google repository as
>     well?
>     >         Or do you
>     >         > want me to do this?
>     >         >
>     >
>     >         I'm not sure what you are referring too. I don't need to
>     upload
>     >         anything
>     >         to code google to make my workbench setup work because I'm
>     fetching
>     >         stuff using HTTP from various locations.
>     >
>     >     I was referring to the eclipse core, SWT and runtime (probably
>     >     others) bundles. They need to be in some maven repository
>     (like the
>     >     one we currently host on code.google), so maven is able to
>     retrieve
>     >     them.
>     >     Another way to do this is maybe create an ant-script that fetches
>     >     the bundles from a local Eclipse RCP target and moves this to a
>     >     local maven repository (default <home>/.m2/repository). This is
>     >     probably better, what do you think?
>     >
>     > Correction :) I just talked with a colleague about this. Maven
>     supports
>     > fetching jars from a "system" path, instead of a maven like
>     repository.
>     > So we could create an "eclipse.target" system path variable and
>     point it
>     > to some local Eclipse install. Developers are required to have an
>     > Eclipse install, but I don't think this is an issue. It would be a lot
>     > easier than maintaining the code.google maven repository for this.
>     >
>     >
>     >
> 
>     Couldn't we simply point to the target we setup using our ant-script (or
>     one day our target-definition), instead of the current eclipse
>     installation? This way you can use whatever IDE you want :-)
> 
> Sure. I'll take a look at it.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ufk-dev mailing list
> ufk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ufk-dev


-- 
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t                        EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl                                        geschaeftsfuehrer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5/1    A-6020 innsbruck      phone    ++43 512 935834