> <
kenneth.westelinck@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
kenneth.westelinck@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> > Will you upload the bundles in our google repository as well?
> Or do you
> > want me to do this?
> >
>
> I'm not sure what you are referring too. I don't need to upload
> anything
> to code google to make my workbench setup work because I'm fetching
> stuff using HTTP from various locations.
>
> I was referring to the eclipse core, SWT and runtime (probably
> others) bundles. They need to be in some maven repository (like the
> one we currently host on code.google), so maven is able to retrieve
> them.
> Another way to do this is maybe create an ant-script that fetches
> the bundles from a local Eclipse RCP target and moves this to a
> local maven repository (default <home>/.m2/repository). This is
> probably better, what do you think?
>
> Correction :) I just talked with a colleague about this. Maven supports
> fetching jars from a "system" path, instead of a maven like repository.
> So we could create an "eclipse.target" system path variable and point it
> to some local Eclipse install. Developers are required to have an
> Eclipse install, but I don't think this is an issue. It would be a lot
> easier than maintaining the code.google maven repository for this.
>
>
>
Couldn't we simply point to the target we setup using our ant-script (or