[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-dev] uDig Scale Bar - Bug 1993
|
That would be great, may want to submit it against the locationtech_ip branch as well?
--
Jody Garnett
On 02/08/2013, at 6:08 AM, Emily Gouge <egouge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone else have any feedback on this change? Should I create a pull request so it is incorporated into the main repository?
>
> Emily
>
>
> On 25/07/2013 2:09 PM, Emily Gouge wrote:
>> For others interested in testing this out I committed the necessary
>> change to a scale branch in my uDig fork:
>>
>> https://github.com/egouge/udig-platform/tree/scale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25/07/2013 10:14 AM, Panagiotis Skintzos wrote:
>>> Thanks a lot Emily! I tested what you suggested in my app, as I was
>>> suffering from the same scale/utm projection bugs (I'm using Finnish
>>> TM35FIN system epsg:3067).
>>> I confirm that it fixes the scales everywhere (map window, scalebar
>>> decoration, printed map).
>>>
>>> -Pana
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Emily Gouge <egouge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24/07/2013 10:17 AM, Philip Donner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Emily for your comments. I do agree with your analysis. Also
>>>>> realized that correct computing depends on the coordinate
>>>>> system. I'll check Lat/Lon projection to see if that could produce an
>>>>> accurate scalebar. Is that ETRS89 (~WGS84) ?
>>>>
>>>> I believe any projection whose units are in degrees will currently work
>>>> okay with the scalebar as the calculateScaleDenominator function runs a
>>>> different computation in that case (so, yes to "ETRS89 (4258)").
>>>> However keep in mind that if you are zoomed out over a "large" area
>>>> (100+km) the distance and scalebar computations are going to be a bit
>>>> different because the distance will be different on different parts
>>>> of the
>>>> map.
>>>>
>>>> I would highly appreciate if you can tune the formula before Sunday
>>>> and
>>>>> our presentation. A map with a scalebar looks much more
>>>>> useful than one where you have to guess the dimensions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wish you good luck, ph
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> udig-dev mailing list
>>>> udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://locationtech.org/**mailman/listinfo/udig-dev<https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> udig-dev mailing list
>>> udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev
> _______________________________________________
> udig-dev mailing list
> udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev
