[udig-devel] Re: Package structure (and branding)

[Jody Garnett <jgarnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

More on package names:

> > org.geotools.udig
>
> I'm not totally against org.geotools.whatever as long as the 
> 'whatever' maintains its own identity strongly enough.  And I suspect 
> uDIG will!

That is part of the fun - we are trying to figure out our identity. Sun 
just complicates matters with the url based package convention.
We have the following available:
1) jump-project.org:  org.jump.project.*   or   org.jumpproject.*  ?
2) udig.refractions.net: net.refractions.udig.*

We may be able to obtain the following:
3) udig.net:  net.udig.*

And matin may allow:
4) geotools.org: org.geotools.jump.*  or org.geotools.jump.* ?

> From there I would like to transition to org.geotools.jump when we 
> have a beta, with a go ahead from Martin. While we did look at 
> net.refractions.udig I think it will be more important to have 
> community involvement.
>
> I agree with that... would net.udig be an option?

Paul is going to look into this one for us - annoything that we have to 
go obtain a domain name for code packaging.
Jody