[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tycho-user] Please test staged tycho
|
I'd expect that optional dependencies generally ignored overall
unless there is also a non-option dependency somewhere else.
Should they be greedy?
On 20.07.2021 16:26, Christian Dietrich
wrote:
my assumtion was that the new impl would treat these optionally
https://github.com/eclipse/tycho/blob/7bef880361d666a4f6cd403c39770cb4f2d36fcd/tycho-core/src/main/java/org/eclipse/tycho/core/osgitools/EquinoxResolver.java#L311
Am 20.07.21 um 16:16 schrieb Keppler
Michael (ETAS/ESW-CI) via tycho-user:
We
had a build failure with 2.4, but it was a problem on our
side: One bundle A has an additional.bundle header
containing bundle B, and B is just not part of the
aggregator. Works fine in PDE, but of course not in Tycho.
I
guess the support for that header cannot be disabled via
some option? I think there are quite some projects using
additional.bundle for “IDE-time dependencies”, like
running MWE workflows in Xtext etc.. When used together
with tycho target platform filtering, this was a nice
trick to have stuff in the target only for the IDE (Junit,
MWE, Xtext, …), but not for the product you build. Looks
like I need to figure out a new workaround for that.
Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan
Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef
Schuermann
Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus
(Vors./chairman), Harald Goertz, Eric Swehla
Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch 15-24,
44536 Lünen (Germany)
Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund | HRB
20621
_______________________________________________
tycho-user mailing list
tycho-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tycho-user
