Figure #2 in the diagram applies if the submitting contributor works
for the same member company as the committer who accepts the patch
(if the member company has signed a Member Committer Agreement). In
that case, the three questions are not required.
HTH,
Wayne
On 10/05/2012 07:46 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
I
do not believe Eclipse legal process [1] has any special
provisions
for member companies.
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-10-05 7:42 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On this subject - does Eclipse member
companies have to provide such
an ip statement on every contribution over 250 lines as long as
they
are not committers ?
Just good to know since i'll just make sure everyone of our
patches
have that added in to them.
/max >
On 05 Oct 2012, at 13:01, Mickael Istria
<mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/05/2012 12:45 PM, Oberlies, Tobias
wrote:
Are the formal requirements for
contributions met? See
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Tycho/Contributor_Guide#Legal_Paperwork
I just made it clear on related Gerrit issues
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets
_______________________________________________
tycho-dev mailing list
tycho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tycho-dev
_______________________________________________
tycho-dev mailing list
tycho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tycho-dev
_______________________________________________
tycho-dev mailing list
tycho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tycho-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects
 |
