Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] Linux Tools 1.1 release

+1

The Juno SR's usually don't have a release review since most projects don't add new features in a service release. So I'm OK with doing this now and getting it out of the way.

Doug.

From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, 17 July, 2012 10:18 AM
To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] Linux Tools 1.1 release

+1

Ok, I assume you have a "business need" to have the 1.1 release now, then, early. If not, best to wait.
But as long as you are willing to test SR1 "stack" and have a 1.1.1 if needed, then I'm fine with this release.

Thanks,




From:        Otávio Pontes <obusatto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        07/17/2012 09:34 AM
Subject:        Re: [tools-pmc] Linux Tools 1.1 release
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




The 1.0 was a typo and I have fixed that.
And we intend to contribute to Juno SR1. We don't plan any minor release
before SR1, but we can have a 1.1.1 if we find bugs in the 1.1.

On 07/17/2012 10:18 AM, David M Williams wrote:
> The doc seems fine, but a) the initial heading says "1.0", I assume
> that's a "typo". But, more important, b. you say "we intend to
> contribute to Juno" ... but, Juno (at least SR0) has come and gone. Did
> you mean SR1 (in which case, its a little early, isn't it?) Or ... did
> you mean something else?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> From: Otávio Pontes <obusatto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> Date: 07/17/2012 09:04 AM
> Subject: [tools-pmc] Linux Tools 1.1 release
> Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The Linux Tools project requests PMC approval for our 1.1 release which
> we intend to contribute to Juno. Our IP log has been submitted
> (before the deadline) and has been approved.Our release review docuware
> is here:
>
>
http://eclipse.org/linuxtools/doc/LinuxTools1.1ReleaseReview.html
>
> I sent one e-mail asking for approval from the technology-pmc and I was
> told to send this to the tools PMC. With the 1.0 release, Linux Tools
> moved to Tools, but the move has not been completed yet; we're waiting
> on a move bug [1] for that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Otavio Pontes
>
>
> [1]
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=382579
>
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc



Back to the top