Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] Xtend2

I meant cross the streams in a Ghostbusters sense :). I'm just wondering if it's conceivable that a bundle may want to reference both Xtends (the language and the code generator thing). Not sure you got that, but they are two completely different things with the same name.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Milinkovich [mailto:mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:04 AM
> To: Schaefer, Doug; 'Tools PMC mailing list'; 'Sven Efftinge'
> Subject: RE: [tools-pmc] Xtend2
> If we're simply moving the component from one place to another, we should
> move all Xtend's history with it. So in my naïve view, I'm not sure why this
> would be different than any other multi-stream development scenario.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schaefer, Doug [mailto:Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > As long as you don't cross the streams, I guess, i.e. a bundle that
> extends
> > Xtend using Xtend...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > OK, I must be an idiot. Why won't bundle versioning allow you to
> > > retain the org.eclipse.xtend namespace in its new home?

Back to the top