Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [tools-pmc] Re: copy of MPL dependency on

Ignore my previous response. Thanks, Wayne!


-----Original Message-----
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:04 PM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] Re: copy of MPL dependency on

This should be okay. Go ahead and put a copy on the build server.

For completeness... this is a sort of grey area. Since we don't distribute from the build server, you can put build-time dependencies there. Subject to the terms of their licenses, of course (i.e. 
commercial software might pose a problem, for example).


Jacek Pospychała wrote:
> Any take on that? or shall I ask EMO?
> thanks!
> Jacek
> 2009/8/3 Jacek Pospychała <jacek.p@xxxxxxxx <mailto:jacek.p@xxxxxxxx>>
>     Dear Tools PMC,
>     Tools/ATF project has problems with unstable builds due to bug
>     Basically our build script is failing, because one of our
>     compile-time dependencies is 3rd party library located at
>     <>.
>     In every build we need to download it to compile against, but this
>     fails sometimes due to network problems (mainly 503: Service
>     Unavailable).
>     Can we have a copy of this library on build server to make our
>     builds independent from network issues?
>     We do not intend to redistribute this library - we're
>     investigating that separately (in CQ 1528).
>     The library is XULRunner from <>,
>     distributed under MPL license.
>     thanks
>     Jacek Pospychala
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
tools-pmc mailing list

Back to the top