Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [tools-pmc] VE incubator - FOCUS

At this point, I give up...

Ed, if you're happy for the rules to be different, why didn't you try to
change them when EMFT was created? That's all I'm trying to do here.

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Ed Merks
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:16 PM
> To: Tools PMC mailing list
> Cc: Tools PMC mailing list; tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] VE incubator - FOCUS
> 
> John,
> 
> Bjorn has talked about bending the rules, but as far as I understand the
> rules and how they've applied to every other project so far (and EMF/EMFT
> in particular), a component can only take advantage of parallel IP if it
> is
> in a conforming incubating project.  A conforming incubating project has
> all downloads clearly marked as incubating and displays the little
> incubating egg on its pages.  I think only options 3 and 4 fall within the
> rules as they have been interpreted and enforced to date.   It's be happy
> for the rules to be different, but that's why I have an EMFT project and
> that's why the Platform and WTP created incubating projects...
> 
> 
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265  (t/l 969)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>              John
>              Duimovich/Ottawa/
>              IBM@IBMCA                                                  To
>              Sent by:                  pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx, Tools PMC
>              tools-pmc-bounces         mailing list
>              @eclipse.org              <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>                                                                         cc
>                                        "'Tools PMC mailing list'"
>              10/22/2007 04:02          <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>              PM                        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        Re: [tools-pmc] VE incubator -
>              Please respond to         FOCUS
>              Tools PMC mailing
>                    list
>              <tools-pmc@eclips
>                   e.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Philippe
> 
> Thanks for persevering.
> 
> My vote is +1 on #1 below ... I clarified which project the component
> would
> be a member of below to make it clear it was a component of VE.
> 
> -1/ an incubating component within VE (a novel approach) would be
> preferred.
> 
> I will consult with the EMO if this is allowed within the current
> incubator
> framework
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
>  "Philippe Ombredanne"
>  <pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx>
>  Sent by:                                                               To
>  tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx                   "'Tools PMC mailing
>                                                  list'"
>                                                  <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  10/22/2007 02:05 PM                                                    cc
> 
>                                                                    Subject
>            Please respond to                     [tools-pmc] VE incubator
>      pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx; Please               - FOCUS
>                respond to
>          Tools PMC mailing list
>         <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> All:
> At that stage I would appreciate that we keep focused on my initial
> request.
> So I am start a new thread.
> I begin to be utterly confused but not yet hopelessly. VE is an all
> volunteer project, so have some mercy.
> 
> The only thing we need (for VE at least) is some flexibility:
> VE Committers have expressed their whish to keep the current core code
> base
> and project as is, not move back to incubation. I shall respect that.
> 
> We have new contributions comming from serious, law-abiding individuals
> and
> organizations, and I want to keep up our fledgling momentum.
> 
> I can do it several ways:
> -1/ an incubating component (a novel approach) would be preferred.
> -2/ an incubating project under VE.
> -3/ a tools incubator
> -4/ a complete separate project.
> 
> I am not asking asking for a discussion, but a simple answer on 1, 2, 3 or
> 4
> so I can move on.
> 
> Cordially
> --
> Cheers
> Philippe
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers
> Philippe
> 
> philippe ombredanne | 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com
> nexB - Open by Design (tm) - http://www.nexb.com
> http://easyeclipse.org - http://phpeclipse.net - http://eclipse.org/atf -
> http://eclipse.org/vep - http://labs.jboss.org/drools/ -
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc


Back to the top