Noted, and thanks.On Sep 5, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: I approve for the Tools PMC.
From: Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 4:07 PM
To: Tom Grosman
Cc: Doug Schaefer
Subject: Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review Tom, I thought I would check with you to see how you are doing with getting ready for your Creation Review. There are two things that need to be in place no later than Monday, Sept. 10: 1. PMC approval for your review (an e-mail from a member of the Tools PMC will suffice for this) 2. Your finalized docuware for the review - I would suggest sending in a draft ASAP, because history has shown that we often need to do two or three rounds before the slides are done. I sent you some more detailed information earlier about things to be sure to include. I can re-send that info if you need it. Please let me know if you have any questions--thanks. On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Tom Grosman wrote:
Anne- Here is the updated list of mentors and initial committers for the proposal page. Mentors- Doug Schaefer (Tools PMC, CDT Project Lead, QNX) Doug Gaff (DSDP PMC Lead, Windriver) Committers- Tom Grosman (Project Lead, Aonix) grosman@xxxxxxxx Adam Haselhuhn (Aonix) haselhuhn@xxxxxxxxx Lisa Jett, (DDC-I) ljett@xxxxxxxx Quentin Ochem (AdaCore) ochem@xxxxxxxxxxx Pat Rogers (AdaCore) rogers@xxxxxxxxxxx Regards, -Tom --------------------------------------------- Tom GROSMAN, Aonix France
De : Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:46 PM
À : Tom Grosman
Cc : Doug Schaefer; Doug Gaff
Objet : Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review Thanks, Tom, I've noted that the two Dougs will be your official mentors. Their names should be added to the proposal. Do you have any more specific names of initial committers? If we're going to update the proposal with the mentor names, we might as well add all new information that you have at this point. I am happy to add this for you, or you could send me a new version of your index.php file if you like. If there are no other changes and you want me to do the update, under "Organization" I would create a header for "Project Mentors" and add Doug S. and Doug G. there, along with their Eclipse affiliations (DSDP PMC Lead for Doug G., Tools PMC and CDT PL for Doug S.) and their e-mail addresses. We should also add e-mail addresses for you and for Adam (and for any new people that get added). On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Tom Grosman wrote:
Anne and Doug, Sorry, I was away on vacation last week and was unable to respond to you emails. I have asked Doug Gaff to act as our second mentor. He has indicated he would be willing to do so. I will be talking to him this week to dot the i’s and cross the t’s. Thanks, Tom --------------------------------------------- Tom GROSMAN, Aonix France
De : Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : Tuesday, August 14, 2007 3:21 AM
À : Doug Schaefer
Cc : Tom Grosman
Objet : Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review Doug, as far as I know that only thing that has happened is that Bjorn explained to Oliver and Tom why Oliver couldn't be one of the two official project mentors. I will wait until Tom has a chance to arrange for two other mentors, one of which I would guess it likely to be you? Thanks for checking. On Aug 13, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Has there been progress on the Mentor front lately (sorry I was on vacation last week and lost track)? We need two. I assume I am one of them. Let me know if you need a recommendation. I know a few people on the council that might fit well. Cheers,
From: Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 2:13 PM
To: Tom Grosman
Cc: 'Doug Schaefer'; 'Oliver E Cole'
Subject: Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review Hi Tom, I've made a note on the calendar that you'd like the September 17 date. That means that you final docuware is due by September 10. As suggested earlier, having the draft docuware sent in by September 3 would be a great idea. Unfortunately, Oliver Cole is not a member of the Architecture Council, so I'm not sure that Bjorn will OK him as one of your two required mentors. Not that Oliver wouldn't be an excellent mentor, but projects are required to have two mentors who are on the Architecture Council, with rare exception. Here's more info about this: Please let me know if you have any questions--thanks. On Aug 10, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Tom Grosman wrote:
Hi Anne, Monday the 17th is fine with me (8am PT). Oliver Cole (PMC TPTP and COSMOS) has agreed to be a mentor for the project. Regards, Tom --------------------------------------------- Tom GROSMAN, Aonix France
De : Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:20 PM
À : Tom Grosman
Cc : 'Doug Schaefer'
Objet : Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review Hi Tom (cc Doug), We are happy to schedule a creation review for you. Please see below for some information you might find useful about preparing for the review call. We should figure out which day will work for you. September is proving a bit hard to schedule in the normal way because of travel and vacations. Currently I have a date open on Monday, Sept. 17 at 8am PT and you could have your review call then. If that won't work, we'll work on finding a date in the first week in September. Just let me know--thanks. ---------------------------- 1) PMC approval for the review (via e-mail to EMO, emo@xxxxxxxxxxx) and 2) the final version of the review docuware. These items are due at least one week before the review conference call date. Helpful documents: The section of the Eclipse Development Process document that briefly describes Creation Reviews is here: Review docuware: Many people underestimate the time and effort needed to create the docuware, so please be sure to allow enough time for this task. The "official" due date for the docuware is one week before the review call (T - one week). However, the docuware needs to be reviewed by the EMO before posting. If you wait until the due date to submit the first draft and the EMO requests changes, then you'll probably miss your deadline and your review will be postponed. We strongly suggest this timeline for submitting docuware: T - two weeks: submit first draft via e-mail to EMO T - 10 days: submit final draft T - one week (due date): EMO posts final version on website before announcing review call Please note that that we need both a vendor-neutral format file (PDF) and the source format that you used to create it; we archive both versions. Many projects overlook these items when they do their first draft: - page (slide) numbers
- copyright notice
- EPL notice
- mentor names
- committer bios
The committer bios don't have to be long or involved, but they should describe each committer's relationship to and history with the incoming code, and/or involvement with the area or technologies covered by the proposal. This document - http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/maya/maya_creation_review.pdf - includes some good examples of committer bios. The docuware should also include the Bugzilla URL for the bug we use for comments and voting. The EMO will open this bug when you submit the first draft of the docuware and supply the URL for inclusion in subsequent versions. -------------------------------
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Tom Grosman wrote:
Hello, I would like to schedule a project creation review for the Hibachi project. I believe we are in a good position now to create a viable Eclipse project that will complement existing projects. I understand that creation reviews are held on Wednesdays. I suggest the first Wednesday in September if that is available. Best Regards, Tom GROSMAN
|
