Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] PTP 1.1 release review

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the input. Responses below. I'll clarify these in the slides before the review.


On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote:

Thanks Greg.  Overall the deck looks good.  One of the things that caught my eye was slide 7 (API).  There are a couple of points that give me pause.
- Runtime and debugger APIs are still evolving
        - What is the status of this API for this release then?

The runtime API for the 1.0 and 1.1 releases are stable. However, the 2.0 release will have significant, breaking, changes, since we're currently implementing considerable new functionality. The debug API will also be relatively stable, though there were some minor changes between 1.0 and 1.1.

- APIs have been kept as stable as possible in this release
        - Not sure how to read that.  did you break API from last release?  

There were some additions to the debug API, but the existing 1.0 API has been preserved. I wouldn't consider that these break the API.

        - What was the last release number?  


        - Have the plugin version numbers been incremented appropriately?

The plugin version will change from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0.

        - How much API was broken?
        - Who will be affected by this?  (e.g., how many people, what kind of people, ...)

No one that I'm aware of. Integrators and contributors are working with the 2.0 (head) branch rather than the 1.x branch. There are a small number of users who will benefit from the enhancements/bug fixes in the 1.1 release.


Greg Watson <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/03/2007 03:36 PM

Please respond to
Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [tools-pmc] PTP 1.1 release review

Here are the slides.


[attachment "PTP 1.1 Review.ppt" deleted by Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/IBM]
On Jan 3, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:

> I think all you would need are completed release review slides.  
> We'll do a
> quick review to make sure you have everything, then you can  
> schedule the
> review with Anne Jacko.
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Greg Watson
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:00 PM
>> To: tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [tools-pmc] PTP 1.1 release review
>> Hi all,
>> I'd like to schedule a review for the 1.1 release of PTP. Now that
>> we're part of Tools, I'd like to conform to your development process.
>> Is there anything in particular that I need to do before scheduling
>> the review?
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>> _______________________________________________
>> tools-pmc mailing list
>> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

tools-pmc mailing list

tools-pmc mailing list

Back to the top