| Re: [thym-dev] build |
|
I still don't get how Xtext gets away with downloading ANTLR and we can't get away with downloading the Cordova CLI tools. It's what users want and it's what we want. BlackBerry has invested a lot in these tools, it's hard to justify doing it again in Thym.
Doesn't make sense.
________________________________________________________________________
From: Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Oct 06 2014 22:28:36 GMT-0400 (EDT) To: Thym developer discussions <thym-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [thym-dev] build I have actually found another CQ[1] which passed fully for a node.js
subset. I guess there is hope. Perhaps, we should have it in orbit.
Unfortunately node.js by itself does not help us completely we still
need to CQ Cordova CLI and all its dependencies.
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:03:58AM +0000, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> +1
>
> It's terrible that we can't reuse the great work that the Cordova teams are doing to provide a good CLI build environment. If I was to build Cordova support from scratch, it's what I would have done. A lot of the world depends on node.js. It's a pretty
acceptable architecture. >
> Doug
>
> ________________________________________________________________________ > From: Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:manderse@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Mon Oct 06 2014 13:53:15 GMT-0400 (EDT)
> To: Thym developer discussions <thym-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thym-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > Subject: Re: [thym-dev] build
>
> On 6 Oct 2014, at 18:53, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
>
> > Depends... CQ-7037 is a "workswith" request which means that orion > does > > not get to distribute node.js and the project must provide valuable > > functionality without it.
>
> Would we *absolute* want to distribute node.js/cli build ?
>
> Would it not be more useful we simply worked with users npm based
> install already ?
>
> /max
>
> >
> > --
> > Gorkem
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:46:37PM +0200, Mickael Istria wrote:
> >> On 10/06/2014 06:41 PM, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
> >>> Also I forgot to mention, if we decide that we need to introduce > >>> node.js
> >>> and cordova CLI as a dependency, we should start a legal IP check >>> for > >>> them with the Eclipse foundation. Frankly, I can not predict if
> >>> IP check would complete postively or not for node.js and CLI so it >>> would > >>> be a good idea to delay the actual work to after IP check.
> >> Node.js was IP-approved for Orion
> >> (http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7037 ) so it would be >> good > >> to use it for THyM.
> >> Cordova CLI would be another story...
> >> --
> >> Mickael Istria
> >> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools> >> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
> >> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> thym-dev mailing list
> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
> >> unsubscribe from this list, visit
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > thym-dev mailing list
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
> > unsubscribe from this list, visit
>
>
> /max
> _______________________________________________
> thym-dev mailing list
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/thym-dev >
> _______________________________________________
> thym-dev mailing list
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/thym-dev
_______________________________________________
thym-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/thym-dev
|