| Re: [technology-pmc] Technology JNoSQL nominations |
Otávio,Just to clarify, "helping at a conference" is in my opinion not a suitable argument for becoming a committer. That's typically done by anyone part of your project community. What's really relevant is contributions to the project such as code, documentation, spec, test results/quality reports, etc.In the future, please make sure to include such information (eg., the links to pull requests or contribution history) in committer nominations.-GunnarOn Jan 26, 2018, at 15:29, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <otaviopolianasantana@gmail.com > wrote:Hello Eric.It happens because the nomination happened twice.But All new committers have been done key contributions to the Project.Second nominees process happens because the commenters forget to vote for the first one.E.g:Also, they're vital persons in the project help in conferences around the world such as JavaOne, Devoxx, and The developer conference.______________________________On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Eric Rizzo <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello fellow committee members,
I noticed the handful of committer nominations for the JNoSQL project yesterday, specifically that the nomination criteria was less than we typically require. In fact, I was about to comment on the nominations that we need more details to demonstrate merit, until I saw that the nominations had already been approved.
Was there additional information that justified the nominations, or some extenuating circumstances?
Eric
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--Otávio Gonçalves de Santana_________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology- pmc