RE: [technology-pmc] STEM proposal

[Daniel Ford <daford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Konstantin,
        thanks
for the great feedback.  

To address your comment about "initial
components", are you thinking that we should list particular components
of STEM's architecture, for instance it's component UML models, or specific
plugins?  What are you thinking would be considered a "component"?
 

To address your comment about "near-term
specifics", are you looking for a development plan?  If so, wouldn't
that make more sense in the "Tentative Plan" section?

The last paragraph  you refer to,
explains that STEM has general features that make it applicable to more
than the specific domain of disease modeling.  It was included to
clarify the technical aspects (scope?) of STEM that make it more than just
a niche project.  This is important because niche projects will have
trouble attracting a large enough community to sustain them and from which
to recruit committers.  

Looking forward to your reply

Dan Ford
IBM Almaden

"Konstantin Komissarchik" <konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx>

01/06/2009 09:50 PM

To	"'Technology PMC'" <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Mike Milinkovich'" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'" <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Daniel Ford'" <daford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [technology-pmc] STEM proposal

I'd like to see a better scope section. The scope
section's main purpose is
to stake out the functional area that this project will cover in near and
long term, so it should be devoid of statements about specific
functionality. Typically you then have a section about initial components
that talks about the near-term specifics. The last paragraph in the scope
section is also concerning. If "disease modeling" is not the
scope, then
that needs further clarification.

- Konstantin


-----Original Message-----
From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anne Jacko
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 5:43 PM
To: Mike Milinkovich; Bjorn Freeman-Benson; Daniel Ford
Cc: Technology PMC
Subject: [technology-pmc] STEM proposal

Mike, Bjorn (cc Daniel, Wayne, and Tech PMC),

We have a proposal for a new project called STEM. It is currently part
 
of OHF but Daniel is proposing to take it out of OHF and make it a  
separate Technology sub-project.

Please review and comment. Thanks.

http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/stem/

Anne Jacko
Eclipse Foundation
503-784-3788





_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc