| RE: [technology-pmc] Is CQ required for this case? |
|
Thanks for forwarding. I was looking for legal team’s address,
but couldn’t find it anywhere. It would be good to add an “if you have further
questions” section to the poster and the related documentation… - Konstantin From: Anne Jacko
[mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx] Konstantin, all IP questions need to be asked of the IP
Team, cc'd above. They are the authority on all IP issues, including
interpreting materials like the Legal Process Poster. We see a fair number of
interesting questions like yours and I refer them all to Janet's team. Thanks. On Dec 29, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
I read through http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf several times, but I am still unclear
which case this situation falls under… There exists a chunk of code in a mature project (WTP Common). A
new project has been provisioned to take this code further (the next iteration
of a framework) using the code in WTP Common as the base. Is a CQ required in
order to get a copy of that initial code base from WTP into the new project’s
CVS repository? Note that the existing code is going to stay in WTP while the
new project matures, so the new project was created under the new project
process (rather than the move process). Thanks, - Konstantin _______________________________________________ |