Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [technology-pmc] Is CQ required for this case?

Thanks for forwarding. I was looking for legal team’s address, but couldn’t find it anywhere. It would be good to add an “if you have further questions” section to the poster and the related documentation…


- Konstantin



From: Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 10:49 AM
To: konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Technology PMC; emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Is CQ required for this case?


Konstantin, all IP questions need to be asked of the IP Team, cc'd above. They are the authority on all IP issues, including interpreting materials like the Legal Process Poster. We see a fair number of interesting questions like yours and I refer them all to Janet's team. Thanks.

Anne Jacko



On Dec 29, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:

I read through several times, but I am still unclear which case this situation falls under…


There exists a chunk of code in a mature project (WTP Common). A new project has been provisioned to take this code further (the next iteration of a framework) using the code in WTP Common as the base. Is a CQ required in order to get a copy of that initial code base from WTP into the new project’s CVS repository? Note that the existing code is going to stay in WTP while the new project matures, so the new project was created under the new project process (rather than the move process).




- Konstantin

technology-pmc mailing list


Back to the top