|Re: [technology-pmc] EPF: Official voting record - new Committers - Batch2|
Thanks for your reply. I tried calling but got your voicemail, so I'll e-reply instead.
Yes, your logic makes sense. You believe that these new committer candidates meet the requirements for demonstrated contribution and that if they prove not to active in the future, you will "ask them to excuse themselves". Good.
I would like to make sure that as the project progresses the new committers have demonstrated actual contributions rather than a promise of future contribution. I realize that during the startup phase this is difficult, but once the project has started there is a well-defined process for proving oneself through contribution before becoming a committer. Thanks.
Thus you have the Technology PMCs approval for the new committers. (Have fun filling out the new committer form for each one http://www.eclipse.org/legal/newcommitter.php item 3 - sorry there is no "bulk mode".)
Bjorn (for the Technology PMC)
below you find an overview of the 21 (some only suggested at this stage) committers and why they are committers. Also, I outline my thinking around committers. I would be happy to receive further guidance on whether my thinking is appropriate.
Back to the top