[swordfish-dev] Interceptor framework design options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[swordfish-dev] Interceptor framework design options

From: Dietmar Wolz <dietmar.wolz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:21:04 +0100
Accept-language: de-DE, en-US
Acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Delivered-to: swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/swordfish-dev>
List-help: <mailto:swordfish-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev>, <mailto:swordfish-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev>, <mailto:swordfish-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcpkQoxAA1iprGDrTpSM5PMIRCV1Tg==
Thread-topic: Interceptor framework design options

I vote for option 2 because of its extendibility and easier handling  
of interceptors in chains

Prev by Date: Re: [swordfish-dev] Interceptor framework design options
Next by Date: Re: [swordfish-dev] Interceptor framework design options
Previous by thread: Re: [swordfish-dev] Swordfish Tests
Next by thread: [swordfish-dev] Swordfish and Sopera policy questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top