Re: [swordfish-dev] Integrating / evaluating servicemix

[Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@xxxxxxxxx>]

FWIW, ServiceMix does not depend on ActiveMQ, though it nicely
integrate with ...
The previous ServiceMix version (3.x) had some features which were
dependant on ActiveMQ, but those features were optional anyway.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 19:04, Scott Lewis<slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Swordfishers,
>
> I'm Scott Lewis, the project lead for ECF http://www.eclipse.org/ecf.  As
> you may have noticed, ECF is doing quite a lot with distributed OSGi these
> days (e.g. http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/NewAndNoteworthy.html), and we have
> plans to do much more along these lines.
>
> We have a provider architecture, that allows various underlying messaging
> frameworks to be used to provide discovery, distribution, messaging, and
> remoting  (e.g. see
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Distributed_OSGi_Services_with_ECF).
> We also have a provider based upon ActiveMQ 5.2.0 that is currently *not*
> hosted at eclipse.org...primarily because we have not yet submitted/had
> approved CQs for ActiveMQ 5.2.0, JMS spec (of appropriate version), and all
> dependencies for ActiveMQ.  But this provider is working and available via
> our CVS server at the OSU Open Source Lab.
>
> This brings me to my question to you:  I've noticed the recent submission of
> CQs for servicemix for Swordfish, and have read that servicemix depends upon
> ActiveMQ, but would like clarification from you:  what is the relationship
> (in CQ terms) between ActiveMQ and servicemix?  That is:  is there already
> approved CQs for ActiveMQ 5.2?  If not, will the servicemix CQs you've
> submitted imply separate/additional CQs for ActiveMQ itself?  As we would
> like to *only* use ActiveMQ in ECF (and not the other parts of servicemix),
> if we need to submit CQs for ActiveMQ separately we will...but we would
> obviously ride on existing/approved CQs if we can...or submit new CQs in
> cooperation with you and/or other projects that could benefit from
> availability of ActiveMQ (e.g. via the Orbit project).
>
> Thanksinadvance for any info,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> Chris Jölly wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> I have some questions regarding the efforts needed to integrate swordfish
>>
>> into an application and how much time is needed to get the first results
>>
>> when e.g. connecting swordfish via web services to an SOAP adapter of
>>
>> an SAP XI system.
>>
>>
>> What I want to do is to evaluate some of this integration platforms and
>>
>> compare  each other. Sure, this efforts depends on the skills of the
>> developers
>>
>> and the concrete use cases, but someone who uses swordfish could possible
>>
>> give a rough figure for this efforts which is sufficient for my needs by
>> now. J
>>
>>
>> And, maybe someone has evaluated other tools like ServiceMix or Mule and
>>
>> has figures for these platforms too?
>>
>>
>> thanks, Chris
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swordfish-dev mailing list
>> swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swordfish-dev mailing list
> swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com