|Re: [sumo-user] [EXTERNAL] Re: capacity analysis|
This would indicate that the default values for ACC and CACC given here, Definition of Vehicles, Vehicle Types, and Routes - SUMO Documentation (dlr.de) are extremely situation specific and I would have to reconsider these values. Would that make sense?
Please be aware that 'ACC' and 'CACC' are just one possible implementation of (cooperative) automated cruise control.
They are not the "definite" models for these things.
If the models behave differently from your expectations, this may reflect the very specific situations they were calibrated for by the original model authors.
In my own tests, I observe that the capacity of 100% CACC with tau=0.6 is up to 16% higher compared to the default. However, this is heavily influenced by the choice of insertion speed value (with values 'desired' and 'avg' performing well and value 'max' performing far worse than the default model.
I suggest that you do your own parameter calibration until the observed results reflect your expectation.
To model different reaction times, use different actionStepLength values for the different types.
Am So., 30. Jan. 2022 um 06:03 Uhr schrieb Pradeep Viyaluru Harinath <pradeep.viyaluruharinath@xxxxxxxx>:
Back to the top